[section and video added 2012:0324]
In the above video, "Registering Tim Tebow and Tom Brady to Vote in Minnesota," we see just how easy it is to commit multiple instances of voting fraud in that state.
And they investigate and prosecute after the fact. But what if the name, SSN, address, etc. are all fake, then who do they prosecute?
And if the election is over and a president has been chosen, they're not going to re-do the election. Just like the WMD's in Iraq. Oops! We're already here, so no turning back. Where's the logic in that? If a president gets elected by a thin margin and the number of fraudulent votes are larger than that margin, then I guess we're all up the creek without a paddle.
If you're driving along and argue with your wife that you are headed in online voting the right direction, but find yourself going over a cliff, would you say, "Oops! We're already committed, so no turning back?" There are a few of the very powerful who might hope for just that kind of blindness. Look what happened in Iraq. Look what happened when the Patriot Act eroded our liberties. Look what happened when last January's NDAA (2012) was signed into law by the silver-tongued devil himself.
Scenario:
Rockefellers and their chums are making trillions of dollars off of their private "Federal Reserve" bank. Do you think they might want to protect that cash cow parasite? Of course they would. They don't want Dr. Ron Paul to become president and pull the plug on that money-making venture. How much would it cost to have forms printed up for all 50 states. How much would it cost to have a group of overseas workers fill in the forms from a computer-generated list of fake names, duplicate SSNs, and real (somebody else's) addresses?
For someone for whom $100/month is adequate to take care of their family, if they receive $1000 for a month's work, they would be thrilled to fill out some pesky papers. Look at all of the people working online doing "gray" employment work -- like spun articles (garbage writing for the explicit purpose of boosting SEO ratings). I did this for awhile, until I realized the overall implications.
If one person can fill out one set of forms in 10 minutes, then they could produce more than a thousand applications a month. And they would be thrilled to do the work.
If you have a thousand people produce filled-out forms for 3 months, you have 3 million fake votes. How much would it cost? $3 million! That's nothing to someone who makes trillions.
By comparison, how much would you be out if you spent the same proportional amount of your income? Imagine you make $100,000 per year. You might end up paying $0.10 (one thin dime) of your gross income for your batch of voter fraud--less than pocket change to sway an election.
When the names are investigated, no one is arrested because the electronic vote necessary safeguards (proper identification) were not in place.
In the above video, "Registering Tim Tebow and Tom Brady to Vote in Minnesota," we see just how easy it is to commit multiple instances of voting fraud in that state.
And they investigate and prosecute after the fact. But what if the name, SSN, address, etc. are all fake, then who do they prosecute?
And if the election is over and a president has been chosen, they're not going to re-do the election. Just like the WMD's in Iraq. Oops! We're already here, so no turning back. Where's the logic in that? If a president gets elected by a thin margin and the number of fraudulent votes are larger than that margin, then I guess we're all up the creek without a paddle.
If you're driving along and argue with your wife that you are headed in online voting the right direction, but find yourself going over a cliff, would you say, "Oops! We're already committed, so no turning back?" There are a few of the very powerful who might hope for just that kind of blindness. Look what happened in Iraq. Look what happened when the Patriot Act eroded our liberties. Look what happened when last January's NDAA (2012) was signed into law by the silver-tongued devil himself.
Scenario:
Rockefellers and their chums are making trillions of dollars off of their private "Federal Reserve" bank. Do you think they might want to protect that cash cow parasite? Of course they would. They don't want Dr. Ron Paul to become president and pull the plug on that money-making venture. How much would it cost to have forms printed up for all 50 states. How much would it cost to have a group of overseas workers fill in the forms from a computer-generated list of fake names, duplicate SSNs, and real (somebody else's) addresses?
For someone for whom $100/month is adequate to take care of their family, if they receive $1000 for a month's work, they would be thrilled to fill out some pesky papers. Look at all of the people working online doing "gray" employment work -- like spun articles (garbage writing for the explicit purpose of boosting SEO ratings). I did this for awhile, until I realized the overall implications.
If one person can fill out one set of forms in 10 minutes, then they could produce more than a thousand applications a month. And they would be thrilled to do the work.
If you have a thousand people produce filled-out forms for 3 months, you have 3 million fake votes. How much would it cost? $3 million! That's nothing to someone who makes trillions.
By comparison, how much would you be out if you spent the same proportional amount of your income? Imagine you make $100,000 per year. You might end up paying $0.10 (one thin dime) of your gross income for your batch of voter fraud--less than pocket change to sway an election.
When the names are investigated, no one is arrested because the electronic vote necessary safeguards (proper identification) were not in place.